(Current posts below this blog) *** Challenges Facing Placer County’s Luxury Homes Tuesday, Nov 11 2008
Uncategorized 6:49 pm
Survey shows lenders still cautious Wednesday, Jul 22 2009
Uncategorized 7:59 pm
Three in four banks tightened mortgage standards
By Inman News, Wednesday, July 22, 2009.
Nearly three out of four major U.S. banks tightened their underwriting standards for residential mortgage loans in the 12 months ending March 31, and one in five discontinued or planned to discontinue one or more retail mortgage products.
While not unexpected, those and other findings of an annual survey by the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency demonstrate the extent of a second consecutive year of tightened lending standards following four years of eased underwriting.
The survey included the 59 largest national banks and $3.6 trillion in commercial residential loans of all types, or more than 84 percent of all outstanding loans in the national banking system.
Among the 52 banks engaged in retail mortgage lending during the survey period, 73 percent reported tightening standards and six said they have exited or plan to exit the business altogether.
That compares with 56 percent of banks that reported tightening underwriting standards for residential mortgages the year before and 14 percent two years ago.
For the second year in a row, no banks reported easing underwriting standards on residential mortgage loans, although 27 percent left them unchanged.
One in five banks had discontinued or planned to discontinue one or more retail mortgage products — a sign of a diminished appetite for risk, OCC said. None of the banks surveyed offered payment-option adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans
In addition to residential first mortgages, the survey examined practices in six other categories, including home-equity loans, high-loan-to-value (LTV) home-equity loans, credit cards, and affordable housing.
Taken as a whole, the survey showed tightened standards for 71 percent of retail loan products, no change in the standards for 29 percent, and easing of standards for less than 1 percent of retail loan products.
Banks tightening their retail lending standards cited more stringent collateral requirements, pricing and loan fees, and debt-service requirements, OCC examiners said.
Despite the additional tightening of standards, examiners still expect retail credit risk to continue to increase over the next 12 months at 87 percent of the banks — particularly in home-equity and credit-card portfolios.
During the survey period, all but one of the 14 banks still making high-LTV home-equity loans said they tightened their standards, and all of the banks had either exited that business in the last 12 months or planned to do so.
Of the 51 major banks making conventional home-equity loans, 78 percent said they tightened their standards during the survey period, and 94 percent said their level of credit risk from such loans had increased.
Non-Traditional Financing in Challenging Lending Market Saturday, Jul 4 2009
Uncategorized 8:03 pm
Call Kia today with your real estate questions or for a referral to get pre-approved with a lender!
Seeking closure on short-sale holdups Thursday, May 7 2009
Uncategorized 7:17 pm
This is a great article posted by Inman News about the Short Sale process and the efforts being made to shorten time frames….Realtors ramp up call for standards!!!!!!
By Gilbert Mohtes-Chan, Thursday, May 7, 2009.
All too often, short sales are really l-o-o-n-g sales — it can take many weeks and months to close a deal.
And patience is increasingly wearing thin across the country as real estate agents become more vocal over the agonizing process. They argue that clearing the nation’s huge inventory of distressed properties is paramount to resuscitate an ailing housing market and sputtering U.S. economy.
A year after sounding off over the problems, Realtors are ramping up a campaign to prod the lending and mortgage servicing industries to embrace universal standards and procedures to streamline the short-sale process. Those include a uniform short-sale application and an online listing of people who service short-sale transactions.
If that doesn’t work, some are threatening to take their case to the White House and ask the Obama administration to convene a special task force.
A call to action
“It’s a disaster. It’s takes forever (to close a short sale). It’s unfair to the buyer and it’s unfair to the seller,” said George K. Wonica, a veteran Staten Island, N.Y., Realtor and chairman of the Nation Association of Realtors’ Conventional Finance and Lending Committee. “NAR has to exercise its power and its pressure to get people to the table.”
Interviews with real estate agents from some of the hardest-hit markets in California, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada and Florida found a bevy of complaints still persist. While banks have cut down the number of days they take to respond to short-sale offers, they also report that communications with lenders remain spotty.
“We’re seeing so many short sales that never come to a close. We have banks dictating how things are done. It has really become the Wild West out here,” said Suzanne Sherer, president of the Realtor Association of Greater Fort Myers (Florida) and the Beach, which represents one of the nation’s most distressed housing markets. “We need some sort of legislation to protect buyers.”
Wonica vows to become more proactive.
In February, Wonica huddled with 10 mortgage bankers and servicers in Florida to address the problems. Wonica said a uniform short-sale form developed by the California Association of Realtors could serve as an industry model. He plans a similar get-together with mortgage bankers and servicers during a summer conference in Las Vegas.
“We want to set up a communications line between the bankers and the brokers. Let’s meet with these guys and see if we could get a meeting of the minds.”
A top Wells Fargo official agrees.
“We as an industry were not the best in getting back to everyone. Wells Fargo has put in processes to address that,” said David Knight, a senior vice president at Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. We’re … working with NAR and other groups (to) reexamine our own process. There is always room (to improve).”
For the foreseeable future, foreclosure and short sales will remain a prominent feature in the real estate landscape. Short sales will continue to be an option for homeowners who owe more on their mortgage debt that their houses are worth.
Saving money with short sales
Indeed, the economic downturn wiped out about $3.3 trillion in home values last year, according to a report by Zillow.com, a company that offers online real estate information. Since the market peak four years ago, home equity has been eroded by more than $6 trillion.
In 2008, short sales accounted for about 11 percent of U.S. home sales, while foreclosure made up 20 percent of the market.
Most experts agree that short sales have a lesser impact to owners and lenders than bank-owned (REO) deals. That is reinforced in a study by Connecticut-based Clayton Holdings Inc., which follows more than $500 billion in mortgage loans for investors. The study showed lenders from May to October 2008 suffered an average 37 percent loan loss through short sales versus 56 percent on homes sold after foreclosure.
We think (a) short sale is superior to foreclosure,” Knight said. “A short sale is not a bad deal all around.”
But these deals are more complicated and time-consuming than traditional sales. All parties with liens on the house — from the second mortgage holder to the private mortgage insurer to the tax collector — must sign off on the transaction. That’s where many of the problems arise.
“My sellers are so frustrated,” Sherer said. “We need to come up with real solutions.”
Tales from the trenches
There is no shortage of complaints from the field:
- In the Fort Myers area, one homeowner had five separate sales contracts rejected by the bank in the past year. The home value slid from $325,000 to about $200,000 today. That home remains unsold.
- In Phoenix, a bank turned down a buyer’s $225,000 offer for a home. Several weeks later, that listed for $200,000 as a bank-owned property (REO) for sale. “It’s hard to know what a bank will consider,” said Jay Thompson of Thompson’s Realty in Gilbert, Ariz. “Some agents won’t list short sales.”
- On California’s Central Coast, a bank took four months to finally accept an offer. But the deal collapsed because the buyer’s financing was no longer available.
- Over the past six months, short sales averaged 113 days to complete compared with 56 days for traditional deals and 43 days for real estate-owned in San Diego County, Calif., according to an analyst by Realtor John Altman of J.T. Altman and Associates in San Diego.
- In Folsom, Calif., one deal took seven months to go through, putting a strain on the buyer’s marriage. “My buyers hung in there.” But they “almost got a divorce in the process. I was ready to quit real estate,” said Tracey Saizan of Keller Williams Realty in Elk Grove, Calif.
Short sales make up three out of five listings in Elk Grove, a suburban community south of Sacramento. Every other day, Saizan spends up to four hours on the telephone with lenders to keep tabs on the seven short-sale deals she has in the works.
On average, it takes 60 days for a bank to respond to an offer, she said, “It would certainly help (if) there are guidelines for banks to follow.”
Progress, of sorts
Savvy real estate agents are setting realistic expectations for their buyers and sellers, stressing patience is a major virtue to survive the process. They suggest homeowners compile financial statements, hardship letters and other information early so a complete short-sale package can be sent to lenders and lessen the chances of a last-minute glitch.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are trying to speed up the process, too. Fannie Mae, for example, launched pilot programs this winter in Florida and Phoenix that preapproved short sales for dozen of homes. The government-backed lender completed the research on a troubled property in advance and obtained all of the necessary clearances in advance.
In February, Wells Fargo crafted a short-sale fact sheet for borrowers and real estate agents that discusses the process and outlines the lender’s time line for dealing with these transactions. Wells Fargo’s goal is making a short-sale decision in 25 business days.
“A little more than a year ago, all the servicers had gotten a little overwhelmed. There was a lot of volume. It was a pretty unfamiliar area. People were treating them as regular sales,” Knight said. “What we’re trying to do is get everything we can do upfront. There are challenges.”
Those challenges include disagreements over payments between first and second mortgage holders. The second, for example, may be offered a $3,000 payment, but it wants $15,000. If the dispute isn’t settled, the short sale falls through.
“You have to deal with all of these different people. Everybody has to take a loss. Not all of those people want to walk away with nothing,” said Louis Galuppo, an attorney and director of Residential Real Estate at the Burnham-Moores Center for Real Estate at the University of San Diego.
Galuppo said there’s no easy answer. Lawmakers can’t dictate how much lienholders should receive. “It’s not going to happen unless we change the very political system. One solution, he said, is for Uncle Sam to set aside a pool of federal money for lienholders to tap into in order to recoup some of their losses.
There is one positive sign that could signal a change. Last month, Bank America said it plans to ease its stand on short-sale payments. A major holder of second liens in the U.S., BofA is seeking 5 percent of sale proceeds after real estate commissions and other costs. Previously, it asked for 10 percent of what homeowners owed on second mortgages or the balance of a home-equity loan.
Still, Wonica isn’t prepared to wait. “I’m going to be aggressive. If they want to fix a problem, sit down at the table and fix it. We have to attack it.”
Is Sacramento Flattening Out? Friday, May 1 2009
Uncategorized 7:20 pm
|
I have good news…the overall market is showing signs of flattening out! In the greater Sacramento area, the # of months of inventory based on pending sales is 3.6 months. That means, if nothing else came on the market it would take 3.6 months to sell the number of homes currently listed. The last time we had a number that low, it was July 2005!!!
The way we can tell if it’s a buyer’s market is if the # of months of inventory (based on closed sales) is greater than 6 months. A neutral market is between 3 & 6 months and a sellers market is less than 3 months.
March statistics show inventory levels decreasing and pending sales on a sharp incline. Increased sales are definitely attributed to low interest rates. According to Inman News, “Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages eligible for purchase by Freddie Mac tied a record low this week, averaging 4.78% with an average 0.7 point. That’s down from 4.8% last week and 6.06% a year ago, Freddie Mac said, and ties an April 7 low in records going back to 1970.
The other reason we’re seeing the sharp increase in purchases is that “feeling” buyers have that their options are disappearing and they don’t want to miss their opportunity before the best listings are gone.
If you want to celebrate the fabulous changes in our real estate market, head to the newly opened Tres Agaves in the Roseville Fountains for Cinco De Mayo!!!
Call Kia today with your real estate questions! Sincerely,
Kia Kapci, Realtor
Executive Associate
|
Is Owning Real Estate in LLC Smart? Tuesday, Mar 10 2009
Uncategorized 10:37 pm
Q: I formed an LLC for real estate purposes. Now my mortgage guy says his company does not do mortgages to LLCs. Is that common? Should I stop putting rental properties in the LLC? What about liability?
A: A limited liability company (LLC) is an entity generally used by businesses to insulate the owners of the company from liability. Some years ago, people had a choice between a corporation and a partnership. Both of those types of entities had limitations. A limited liability company allowed owners to have flexibility in the manner in which the owners of the LLC entity would distribute profits and allowed other tax benefits.
Most commercial lenders have no problems giving loans to LLCs, and that’s the problem you have run into. You probably aren’t getting a loan from a commercial lender, but from a residential lender.
Residential lenders may have much lower mortgage rates than many commercial lenders, but the rules residential lenders must abide by differ greatly from the rules followed by commercial lenders. One of the rules followed by residential lenders is to make loans to individuals not corporations or companies, and, in addition, the property being financed must be residential — it could be a single-family or it could be a four-unit apartment building.
If you have many properties and run your real estate as a business, you may want to have all of the properties owned by the LLC, in addition to benefiting from the protections from liability that the LLC would give you personally.
Before you decide to stop putting rental properties in an LLC or taking properties out of the LLC, you need to make sure that any transfer from the LLC wouldn’t trigger any adverse federal income taxes. Also, in some states it can be costly to transfer title from the LLC to the individual.
You should sit down with an attorney to discuss these issues. The first issue in deciding whether an LLC is right for you is knowing how it will help you. If you have all of your life savings in the properties that are in the LLC and little in terms of assets outside the LLC, you stand to lose almost everything if your company is sued and loses the case.
For some property owners in your situation, they are better off spending more money on broad coverage liability and property insurance than in the costs to set up and maintain an LLC. For others, the answer may be to have multiple LLCs, one for each property they own. Depending on your circumstances, you may decide to keep the LLC or not use it at all.
Finally, when you ask about liability, you need to determine what kind of liability you are trying to protect yourself against. Do you have sufficient insurance to cover you for that issue? If you manage your own properties, could you be personally liable for your poor management? Do you have a third-party management company taking care of the buildings? Will you be able to escape liability if one of your tenants is hurt as a result of your direct actions? If you make your own repairs on your building and you do something wrong and someone is hurt, would they be able to sue you directly anyway?
These are the issues you need to discuss with your attorney, and perhaps even your company tax preparer. You may find that a better option is to keep your properties out of the LLC, buy additional insurance to cover any potential liability, and obtain cheaper financing from residential lenders.
Article By Ilyce Glink, Friday, March 6, 2009.
Co-written by Samuel J. Tamkin
Inman News
Homes Over $750,000 in the Greater Sacramento Area Tuesday, Mar 10 2009
Uncategorized 10:26 pm
January 2009 Update Saturday, Jan 10 2009
Uncategorized 6:51 pm
Happy New Year!


What to expect in the Sacramento Real Estate Market through 2009? Tuesday, Nov 4 2008
Uncategorized 6:41 pm
November 4, 2008
Hopefully your Halloween wasn’t as scary as our economic state! I went to a seminar last week to hear the California Association of Realtors (CAR) chief economic advisor, Leslie Appleton Young. She shared great information about how the real estate market got here, what our market looks like now and what we should expect over the next two years. Since the media likes to sensationalize the news for ratings, I’d like to be the one to give you the latest facts and expected trends. Below are some of the highlights of the speech.
Bottom???
The good news is economists believe the Sacramento area will hit bottom in 2009, which is down from the previously anticipated 2011. The Sacramento area has experienced a 44% decline in value since the height of the market in Aug 2005. Interestingly, San Francisco didn’t hit the height of the market until May 2007 and have only lost 27.5% of their value. Looking at the difference between the Sacramento and San Francisco’s markets are is precisely why it’s difficult to listen to nationwide or even statewide information. Each county and city has its own unique trends.
Local Statistics
Currently there is a huge amount of activity in Sacramento. Our pending sales are up 10.2% from last month and 190% from 1 year ago. Affordability in California is up 24%. California inventory levels are now at 6.7 months. Anything above 6 months is a buyers market, below 3 months is a sellers market and in between 3&6 months is a neutral market. We’re almost in neutral territory.
International Buyers
Tahoe, San Francisco and Palm Springs are attracting international cash buyers. Buyers in many other parts of the world don’t believe in financing homes. They wait to purchase until they can pay cash. They recognize the value here and have negotiating power with cash offers.
How Did We Get Here?
If we go back to 2000-’01 there were huge interest rate cuts because of the stock market crash. This became very helpful for the real estate market. By the end of 2004 it was apparent we needed to pull the real estate market back into balance. The problem was, it could no longer be controlled by interest rates alone. Underwriting mortgages became so loose with their requirements that people were buying homes they couldn’t afford from day 1, regardless of their interest rate increasing in the future. This spiral continued until the height of the market in 2005 when people were scared they were missing the market and if they didn’t get in quick they’d never be able to afford a home. These people quickly and easily qualified for a loan, which led them to believe it would be just as easy to refinance before their loans adjusted. We never know the true height (or bottom) of the market until a few months later.
What to expect now?
Subprime & Alt Arm Loans Resetting
Sacramento was one of the first markets to reach the height of the market and one of the fastest to fall. We’re also predicted to come out of the downward spiral early. The good news is 40% of subprime loans already reset, with an expected 15% in ‘09 and possibly 5% in ‘10. The next wave of possible foreclosures will be when the Alt Arms reset in 2010-2011. The reality is most of these people have already refinanced, sold or lost their home to the bank. 54% of these have already reset with an expectation of 5% in ‘08, 5% in ‘09 and 37% in ‘10 (If the loans are still in place).
2009 Concerns The number 1 concern for 2009 is jumbo financing. Construction loans and jumbo financing are extremely difficult to obtain today. Banks today have become portfolio lenders and we haven’t been in this position for 15 years. Investors don’t want to buy these mortgages so the banks are getting squished. With few places for mortgage brokers to borrow money in excess of $417,000, the requirements are becoming extremely tight. It’s not uncommon to need a 40% down payment, with impeccable credit and a low debt to income ratio and the interest rates are still higher. My advice? If you have been waiting to take advantage of this market and buy that step up luxury home then look aggressively now if you don’t want to put 50% down. There are incredible deals right now for homes over $750,000.
Suggested Reading…
Infectious Greed by Frank Partnoy
Contact Kia Kapci with your real estate questions…. www.KiaKapci.com